MARKET FLASH:

"It seems the donkey is laughing, but he instead is braying (l'asino sembra ridere ma in realtà raglia)": si veda sotto "1927-1933: Pompous Prognosticators" per avere la conferma che la storia non si ripete ma fà la rima.


lunedì 3 settembre 2018

Peso Set To Disintegrate After IMF Tells Argentina To Stop Supporting Currency

On May 11, three days after Argentina secured a $50 Billion IMF bailout - the largest in the fund's history - we jokingly noted that with the peso resuming its slide, an indication the market did not view the IMF backstop as credible, the ECB would need to get involved.

In retrospect, it now appears that this may not have been a joke, because with the Peso plummeting, and surpassing the Turkish Lira as the worst performing currency of 2018 having lost half its value YTD...

... with the bulk of the collapse taking place in August...

... Christone Lagarde had even more bad news for Buenos Aires and Argentina president Mauricio Macri: the IMF now insists that after burning through billions in central bank reserves, Argentina should stop using funds to support the peso, and float it freely.

According to Infobae, the Argentine foreign currency reserves have declined below the level demanded by the IMF, with Argentine authorities selling $2.5BN to support the peso in August; meanwhile the overall level of reserves has slumped even more, approaching the levels before the IMF bailout while failing to prop up the currency which, as shown below, has collapsed in a move reminiscent of what is taking place in hyperinflating Venezuela.

Worse, the Argentine Peso suffered its latest sharp drop in the days after the central bankunexpectedly hiked rates to 60% - the highest in the world - and another indication that the market is firmly convinced that not even the IMF backstop will force Argentina into a painful, and politically destabilizing structural program.

After all it is less than two decades after the IMF tried the exact same playbook with Argentina and the result was a default.

Meanwhile, as the IMF tells Argentina to let the peso "drop dead", fears of an economic depression are growing, and as Infobae notes, "unable to defuse the bomb left by the Kirchner regime, the government now faces the obligation to make a painful structural adjustment , as has happened so many other times in Argentina. Everything that the government wanted to avoid with its gradualist policies was ushered in by the market: mega-devaluation, high inflation and a collapse in purchasing power" as IMF enforces another round of austerity in Argentina; the same Argentina which defaulted the last time the IMF was in charge. The result, Infobae laments, is well known: "a fall in activity and increase in poverty."

Even before the IMF shift, the administration of Mauricio Macri was preparing to implement the painful measures, with TN reporting that after a seven-hour meeting with advisers on Saturday to discuss currency crisis, Macri would raise export taxes to take advantage of the one silver lining from the collapsing currency, a boost to Argentine exports, and close 10 to 12 ministries, including Science and Technology, Culture, Energy and Agro-Industry. The president would also remove deputy Cabinet Chiefs Gustavo Lopetegui and Mario Quintana.

Of course, the export taxes mean that much of the peso devaluation will be offset by the government taking its own pound of flesh, as per IMF instructions.

Here Infobae does not mince its words, warning that the result of this tax reform will be disastrous, as next year the tax pressure will increase again, instead of falling, and will add further pressure on the exchange rate that in less than three months has left the country in the middle of a deep recession.

The deterioration is so great, the publication notes, that all the government can do is hope to avoid a "knock out blow", and another sovereign debt default.

Now event are set in motion that would result in a new default, which would not only have tremendous consequences for an already weakened economy, but also pose a big question mark how president Mauricio Macri reaches the end of his term.

Meanwhile, further pressuring the economy will be the "strong fiscal adjustment" that will be enacted per IMF instructions in 2019. "Start with 0" , explained the Government when asked how it will achieve a fiscal balance. That would mean not only higher taxes, but slashing spending, and a wave of popular unrest and political chaos. As Infobae predicts, the 1.3% primary deficit is now a thing of the past, and the government is hoping to reach levels between 0.4% and 0.5%, "a fiscal goal that is as ambitious as it is difficult to meet."

But while the government agrees with the IMF on the need to launch a highly unpopular fiscal adjustment, it certainly disagrees on the IMF's demands that Argentina reserve be used exclusively for the payment of the debt; here the Government insists on the necessity to have flexibility to intervene in the exchange market when it is necessary.

And this is where the IMF's unexpected order to stop intervening in the peso came in: there were heated discussions between the staff of the IMF and the president of the Central Bank, Luis Caputo, as the IMF "bureaucrats" were alarmed not only by the rate of rise of the dollar, but by the loss of reserves, Infobae reports.

Specifically, the IMF is alarmed that in August alone, Central Bank reserves fell by $5.3 billion, from $58 billion at the end of July, to just $52.7 billion one month later. This level is $2.5 billion below the goal of reserves that the IMF had "instructed" the Government to keep by the end of September; this has been seen as a "flagrant breach of the commitments promise to Washington", as the terms of the agreement did not even last three months.

A big reason for this slide is that, as noted above, the Central bank was extremely active in the market, supporting the peso even as it plunged, and intervened through a series of tenders: throughout August, it sold almost $2.5 billion, even as the peso lost over a third of its value in August.

This prompted the IMF to insist on its original idea: the dollar must float freely, the price of the currency must be fixed by the market, and in addition, the Fund's loan should not be used to finance the flight of capital." The message is clear: if investors want to buy dollars, make it very expensive for them to do so.

The bigger problem is that the Argentina Central Bank has already lost control: last Thursday, the dollar soared from $34.50 to $42 against the peso, underscoring the fragility of the exchange policy, because even as the central bank sold $400 million, the currency plunged 20%. Then the central bank was forced to urgently sell another $300 million before the USDARS closed at 40.

Hence the dilemma faced by the IMF and Argentina: for the Fund it is essential to preserve to avoid sending a signal of weakness, and leading to a collapse in the local bond market. But for central bank head Luis Caputo, allowing the dollar to rise so quickly leads to an even worse outcome, generating fear among investors and accelerating the collapse of local assets.

Meanwhile, the recent unprecedented rate hike became irrelevant, as it is useless to offer a 60% rate on pesos if the dollar rises 30% or 40% in a month.

Therefore, to Argentina it is essential that the monthly devaluation be well below the level of rates in the coming months. Only then - the bank claims - it will be possible to attract investors who are willing to buy Argentine risk.

"With bonds that yield 11% annually in dollars and bonds in pesos at 60%, it is the ideal time to awaken greed". But for that to happen it is necessary to ease the panic the behavior of the exchange rate.

That won't happen if the IMF does not back off its latest position; in fact, if the market sees the peso as no longer having the support of the central bank, the ARS could disintegrate as soon as the Monday open, plunging by a record amount.

This is why the president of the Central Bank, Luis Caputo, and his deputy, Gustavo Cañonero, scrambled to urgently get on the plane to the IMF's Washington HQ, where Finance Minister Nicolás Dujovne will also bepresent. The Argentina officials will go to Washington to convince the IMF authorities that they need much more leeway to intervene and calm the exchange market.

If they don't get it, the Emerging Market currency crisis is about to get far worse, and another Argentina default would be inevitable. As Infobae concludes, "it is an open-ended fight that is keeping in suspense not only the negotiators, but all the Argentines who will suffer the ravages of the mega-devaluation of the last month."

Real Gold and Silver Are Hedges Against the "Stupidity of the Elites" - Kiyosaki

Real Gold and Silver – 7 Reasons Robert Kiyosaki Owns Them

In Robert Kiyosaki's just-released book 'FAKE – Fake Money, Fake Teachers, Fake Assets',the best selling 'Rich Dad' author and respected personal finance expert details the seven reasons he owns "real gold and silver."

The book is designed to deliver insights and answers to help the millions of people – many of whom have had little in the way of financial education — determine what is 'real' and relevant to their financial future.

Kiyosaki is the inspirational author of "Rich Dad, Poor Dad," the No. 1 selling personal finance book of all time, and therefore always worth listening to.

Kiyosaki believes in the law of attraction and the principle that 'like attracts like' and focusing on the purest forms of wealth - gold and silver - attracts like and brings more wealth into gold owners lives.

He believes that holding real gold coins and bars attracts wealth to gold bullion owners through the law of attraction and is the best way to attract wealth and have a steady income.

In the book, CHAPTER 3 of which was released on Saturday (September 1st), Kioyosaki considers the 7 Reasons I Own Real Gold and Silver and we feature an short extract in our market update today:

REASON #1: Real gold and silver are not investments.

I do not own gold and silver to make money. They are insurance, a hedge against the stupidity of the elites… and myself.

I have insurance on my car, just in case someone hits me, or in case I hit someone else. Gold and silver serve a similar purpose.

I do not trust the elites. They believe they know everything. They believe they are always right In their minds, they do not make mistakes. They will never admit they are wrong.

Elites are not the only ones with this affliction. All of us are afflicted with the "I am right and you are wrong" disease. We all know someone who is always right.

At times, I am that person, too.

 

Kiyosaki is a consistent, long-time advocate of owning gold and silver bullion coins and bars as a way to protect and grow wealth, especially during uncertain financial times.

This Decoupling Has Never Been Greater

The divergence between financial conditions in the U.S. and Asia ex-Japan has got to extreme levels, according to the Bloomberg data.

As Bloomberg's Ye Xie details, the tighter the conditions are, the harder it is for companies to raise capital, the higher the risk of a growth slowdown, which appears to be getting priced into US and Asia stocks...

Conditions in the U.S. are about one standard deviation more accommodative than normal, while Asia is tighter by a similar amount.

The euro-zone is about neutral. Bloomberg doesn't have data for Latam, but it wouldn't be a stretch to assume it's a similar situation as in Asia, if not worse.

This is another way of saying that global growth is becoming less synchronized.

The question is, whether the U.S. pulls the EM up, or EM pulls it down.

One way or the other, the current divergence won't last long.

New High In Stocks Brings Warning From Volatility Market

While stocks are finally back testing new all-time highs, the volatility market is well off of its yearly lows, a divergence that has been problematic for stocks the past 2 decades.

The S&P 500 (SPX) made its long-awaited (& much heralded) return to its January all-time highs this week. But while stocks are back at their highs, volatility expectations (specifically, the VIX, or S&P 500 Volatility Index) — which tend to trend in the opposite direction — remain well above their 52-week lows. Now, there are always bound to be divergences at new highs in the equity market  — and, thus, divergences that matter very little, or none at all. However, the extent of the recent SPX/VIX divergence has got our attention.

Specifically, on Tuesday, the SPX touched a new all-time high (intraday). However, the VIX closed more than 40% above its 52-week closing low of 9.14 set last November. Over the last 20 years (actually 19-plus years), there have been just 3 other similar occurrences, though, the prior occurrences experienced clusters of such days. As the chart indicates, those prior occasions were very inauspicious times to be investing in the stock market, to say the least.

As one can see in the chart, the only other such divergences since mid-1999 came at the following junctures:

  • December 1999-March 2000: Cyclical Top

  • April-October 2007: Cyclical Top

  • December 2014-February 2015: Major Intermediate-Term Top

We don't have to tell you how poorly the equity market did following these periods, but we will...

The long-term returns were the worst, especially the 1-year median return of -11.3%.Just 1 date (11/3/2014) saw a positive 1-year return and just 7 of the prior 26 saw a positive 6-month return. The short-term was also very weak with median 2-week and 1-month returns of -2.6% and -3.8%, respectively.

The intermediate-term saw a bit of a dead-cat bounce in some cases, mostly in December 1999, April-July 2007 and December 2014. That point highlights the fact that, while this signal has eventually been a warning sign for stocks, it has not necessarily been an immediate one. Indeed, the mere presence of clusters of signals around the aforementioned occurrences indicates that the first instance is not typically an immediate longer-term death knell for stocks. As tops are processes, we have seen these divergences take time to play out into negative ramifications during events in the past 19 years. However, overall, this divergence has been an extremely consistent and accurate warning sign eventually for stocks over the past 2 decades.

Now, along with the "cluster caveat", we have another caveat to consider — the pre-1999 period. That's because we observe a large sample of divergences occurring between 1987 and early-1999 that did not carry such negative consequences, at least not with the same consistency.

As the chart indicates, if we take the chart back another decade-plus, we observe an abundance of signals, particularly during the mid-1990's, that accompanied mostly a rising stock market. There were a few good intermediate-term warning signs (that may be difficult to see), e.g., 1987, 1989, 1996, 1997, 1999. However, the majority of signals saw little to no ill-effects on the stock market.

The question is, are we currently in that mid to late-90's melt-up stock market scenario, or more of the post-1999 environment. Our (strong) opinion is that we are in that latter market environment. Therefore, while this signal may just be the first of several clustered occurrences yet to come, our analysis would lead us to believe that this signal will indeed eventually have negative ramifications for the stock market.