MARKET FLASH:

"It seems the donkey is laughing, but he instead is braying (l'asino sembra ridere ma in realtà raglia)": si veda sotto "1927-1933: Pompous Prognosticators" per avere la conferma che la storia non si ripete ma fà la rima.


domenica 30 settembre 2018

mercoledì 26 settembre 2018

The show in on!



Just after the FOMC statement (plus quarter point) market reacted slightly well, S&P500 was +0,22%.......

...... unfortunately the S&P500 future closed at -0,33%, touching few seconds before -0,39% (-0,32% just few minutes before closing) ...... got the problem ??



Considering hourly chart the situation is more evident ........ hanging the more market participants it's possible.... before "completing the chain"!! 😎😉

martedì 25 settembre 2018

Jamie Dimon: America Will Need 25 Years To Forgive Wall Street For The Crisis

JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon has never been one to shy away from the press. But barely two weeks after he boasted that he could defeat President Trump in a presidential race - inspiring speculation that the CEO of America's largest bank by assets is shadow-campaigning for the Democratic nomination - Dimon is once again making the media rounds, sitting for an interview with CNBC's Jim Cramer before delivering a widely reported address at the World Affairs Council in Philadelphia.

Dimon

It was at this latter event that Dimon offered what was probably the closest he's ever come to a mea culpa for Wall Street's recklessness in the run-up to the financial crisis. With the US economy finally booming again after a tepid, nearly decade-long recovery, Dimon predicted that the public will require 25 years to get over the financial crisis and finally forgive Wall Street.

Still, he believes the government "did the right thing" by casting moral hazard aside and immediately coming to the rescue of the struggling banks, leaving American consumers to shoulder most of the consequences for their reckless behavior.

Here's Bloomberg:

"It's going to be 25 years," Dimon, the CEO at JPMorgan Chase & Co., said Monday at a event sponsored by the World Affairs Council in Philadelphia.

Still, the government "did the right thing" to avoid a disaster, Dimon said, adding that the economy was facing the risk of another Great Depression.

Of course, as we have written extensively, not everyone agrees with Dimon's sanctimonious comments about how "right" the government was in bailing him out, and we suspect it will be a lot more than 25 years before he or the government is forgiven, as Michael Hudson recently noted:

Today's financial malaise for pension funds, state and local budgets and underemployment is largely a result of the 2008 bailout, not the crash. What was saved was not only the banks – or more to the point, as Sheila Bair pointed out, their bondholders – but the financial overhead that continues to burden today's economy.

Also saved was the idea that the economy needs to keep the financial sector solvent by an exponential growth of new debt – and, when that does not suffice, by government purchase of stocks and bonds to support the balance sheets of the wealthiest layer of society. The internal contradiction in this policy is that debt deflation has become so overbearing and dysfunctional that it prevents the economy from growing and carrying its debt burden.

Trying to save the financial overgrowth of debt service by borrowing one's way out of debt, or by monetary Quantitative Easing re-inflating real estate, stock and bond prices, enables the creditor One Percent to gain, not the indebted 99 Percent in the economy at large. Therefore, from the economy's vantage point, instead of asking how the banks are to be saved "next time," the question should be, how should we best let them go under – along with their stockholders, bondholders and uninsured depositors whose hubris imagined that their loans (other peoples' debts) could go on rising without impoverishing society and preventing creditors from collecting in any event – except from government by gaining control over it...

...

President Obama, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and their fellow financial lobbyists at the Federal Reserve and Justice Department are credited with saving "the economy," as if their donor class on Wall Street was a good proxy for the economy at large. "Saving the economy from a meltdown" has become the euphemism for saving bondholders and other members of the One Percent from taking losses on their bad loans. The "rescue" is Orwellian doublespeak for expropriating over nine million indebted Americans from their homes, while leaving surviving homeowners saddled with enormous bubble-mortgage payments to the FIRE sector's owners.

What has been put in place is not a restoration of traditional status quo, but a reversal of over a century of central bank policy. Failed banks have not been taken into the public domain. They have been enriched far beyond their former levels.

Additionally, in what appeared to be another gesture of deference to Trump, Dimon said he agrees with the president that the US needs proper border security and immigration reforms.

He added that Trump is right about trade issues he has been raising with China, but wrong in using tariffs to address the problem.

Just in case you got the wrong idea, Dimon clarified to CNBC that, though he has no plans to run, he believes a CEO could make a good president, adding that Trump "was a CEO."

"I would not say a CEO can not be a good president," Dimon said in an interview with CNBC's Jim Cramer on "Squawk Alley." President Donald Trump "was a CEO," he added.

"Jamie, you know what you sound like when you say these things, right? You sound like a politician," Jim Cramer said.

"I'm a patriot," Dimon said.



Found: The Driving Force Behind The Economy


Found: The Driving Force Behind The Economy

Fake news!

And this is how a meme is created. Complete shulbit will do it for you. Even the Weather Channel is faking it to get eyeballs.

And as if getting caught shulbitting folks would have caused one to stop and say, "Whoah there big boy, maybe we should just report, you know, what's actually happening." Nooo!

Doubling down:

And people wonder why the mainstream media is no longer trusted?

It's a One Way Street

President Donald Trump's national security adviser, John Bolton, says the ICC court is "illegitimate".

"For all intents and purposes, the ICC is already dead to us."

This is significant and to be expected.

We can expect the global cohesion that we enjoyed in the last crisis of 2008 to continue to be less cohesive going forward.

Criminal Probe

I've never tried one but I hear they're worse then civil.

Which makes this a pretty big deal.

As reported by Bloomberg:

Tesla is Facing U.S. Criminal Probe Over Elon Musk Statements.

"Federal prosecutors opened a fraud investigation after Musk tweeted last month that he was contemplating taking Tesla private and had "funding secured" for the deal, said the people, who were granted anonymity to discuss a confidential criminal probe."


And this response from Tesla:

"We have not received a subpoena, a request for testimony, or any other formal process. We respect the DOJ's desire to get information about this and believe that the matter should be quickly resolved as they review the information they have received."

And once this can of worms is opened, who knows what gets found in the entrails of Tesla's accounting department.

"Now that Musk's tweeting has attracted the Justice Department's attention, investigators there could extend their review to other public statements made by the CEO about the company's health, according to one of the people familiar with the matter. Authorities could also look into the circumstances surrounding the resignation of Tesla's Chief Accounting Officer, Dave Morton, after less than a month on the job, the person said."

Luckily for Elon, gullible, dumb investors in their naïveté don't mind too much. They're betting on iron man after all. Hero worship of the most extraordinary kind. The stock rallied $10 on the news.

On the other hand, the bonds are getting spanked like a transvestite in a leopard skin thong — down at a smidgen over 85. Oh and by the way, that's junk status if you're not familiar with such things.

And really, if I'm to be honest with you, I think that seals it. Why?

Well, Tesla can't do a capital raise while they're under criminal investigations and they sure as hell need to raise capital.

The other thing is they're outta time and bureaucracies aren't really known for their speed so we can reasonably except this investigation to take a good amount of time; time Tesla simply doesn't have.

For the time being though, the show must go on.

And speaking of a show....

Wowza!

I've grabbed a half dozen weed stocks at random for your gentle eyes. Take a look.

The funniest of the lot is, of course, Tilray (TLRY), which actually hit $300 a share a few days ago. That makes it worth more than some countries, and while I don't profess to know much about the stock, looking only at the basics I can tell you this: It isn't. Worth. $15billion.

Shorting is tough, and I'll be the first to admit I rarely short.

What I do know is this. Getting long cannabis stocks here and now impresses me as batshit crazy. These things are like the cryptos of 2017. Full of frauds, hype, hope, and happy investors. Not where you're likely to find asymmetry on the long side.

Talking of crazy...

How to Return to the Dark Ages

The PC crowd over in Sweden are hard at work ensuring "disadvantaged minority groups" aren't taken advantage of and attempting to mask the existence of facts. Let's not only pretend that things aren't what they evidently are but let's force everyone else to agree with our asinine opinions.


Hesslow cited empirical research which supports the idea that there are differences between men and women which are "biologically founded" and therefore genders cannot be regarded as "social constructs alone".

The university rector had ordered a "full investigation" into the case and said that there "have been discussions about trying to stop the lecture or get rid of me, or have someone else give the lecture or not give the lecture at all."

There is a reason that the period of enlightenment in the 18th century brought about the birth of what we today know as and recognise as Western civilization. It was a period of truth seeking, freedom of thought, expression, and action.

If we're to be honest, the reason these idiots have modern plumbing and a shop that makes their soy lattes is rooted in this. And now, day by day, they're actively tearing it down. This is NOT good.

The Driving Force of Economic Growth and Development

Queue the hate mail.

After Years Of Pain, Odey Is Suddenly The Year's Best Performing Hedge Fund

It had been a tough several years for LPs in Cripsin Odey's hedge fund, who has for years predicted a market crash which, well, has yet to happen, and suffered dramatic losses as his predictions failed to pan out with his flagship hedge fund plummeting in 2016 and 2017. That did not change his outlook, however, and in his latest newsletter sent earlier this month, he once again flagged his bearish views.

His funds are "positioned for more difficult times, invested in those companies that would be able to take advantage of a crisis, should it come along," he wrote. "Who knows when that happens? As Noah said to the doubters, 'How long can you tread water?'"

However, thanks to a correct bet on Italian bond volatility earlier in the year, The Odey European Inc. fund, which manages about $700 million, gained about 29% this year through Sep. 14, according to the latest HSBC weekly hedge fund tracker, making it the top performing hedge fund in 2018 ranked by HSBC.

And now, in a delightful irony, Odey is taking on even greater gains - on the long side of his book.

As Bloomberg rerorts, the London-based manager is one of the largest shareholders of both Sky Plc and Randgold Resources, the two-biggest gainers of the STOXX Europe 600 Index on Monday, amid a flurry of merger announcements. Randgold surged more than 6% after Canada's Barrick Gold agreed to buy the gold miner in a $18 billion deal, while Sky surged as much as 8.8% after Comcast won the auction for the U.K. broadcaster with a bid of 17.28 pounds a share, a premium of 9% to Sky's Friday closing price.

"I'm very pleased. It was a great price," Odey told Bloomberg of Sky the final Sky deal in a phone interview, adding that he added to his bets when the shares traded at 14.92 pounds. Odey had previously predicted that a deal could fetch as much as 18 pounds a share.

And so, if the world really does end tomorrow, all the pain his LPs took for so many years will finally have been worth it. The only question is how many of them are left.

lunedì 24 settembre 2018

Multiple Online Banking Systems Go Down In The UK


Payment chaos: For bottom-line-obsessed bank executives, IT systems are an expense to be slashed. The results are in.

Internet banking has become a crisis-prone business in the UK, as the online platforms of big banks suffer regular outages and other forms of IT disruption.

Friday morning, the online systems of the Royal Bank of Scotland, Ulster Bank and Natwest - all part of the RBS Banking Group - crashed in unison, leaving millions of customers unable to pay bills or view their balance on their online and mobile accounts. The group has 19 million customers in the UK and Republic of Ireland and 5.5 million active mobile app users.

After around five hours of chaos, the RBS Group announced that the problems had been resolved. The failure had apparently been caused by a "technical glitch" — a word that is being used with increasing frequency by high-street lenders — in a regular update to their firewall. The bank emphasized that it was an "access issue" and there is no evidence that customer data was compromised. But then, it would say that!

On Thursday, it was the turn of the UK's largest bank, Barclays, whose website and telephone banking service crashed for around seven hours, leaving frustrated customers locked out of their online accounts.

Fed-up customers took to social media to vent their anger, with some complaining that they were unable to access their accounts not only through the Internet platform but also ATMs. Barclays has around 24 million UK customers, though it's not clear how many of them were affected by the outage.

The bank told customers that they should still be able to make payments to existing payees through mobile banking, though new payees weren't possible due to the incident. It also claimed that payments into accounts were unaffected by the issues.

One alarmed customer begged to differ, complaining to the BBC that a payment due into his account had gone missing, while another customer reported the systems inside branches being down, preventing customers from carrying out transactions even in the old fashioned, pre-digital way. By mid-afternoon, the IT "glitch" — that word again! — had been "resolved," though no explanation has yet been given as to what caused it.

A few days earlier an outage at online challenger bank Cashplus, which targets people with poor credit histories, left customers unable to access their accounts, make cash withdrawals, or make or receive payments. The problems prompted Nicky Morgan, chair of the Treasury Committee, to ask Richard Wagner, chief executive officer of Cashplus, for an explanation of what happened and how victims of the outage will be compensated.

In other words, over the last two days, dozens of millions of UK bank customers have been locked out of their online accounts at different banks.

In terms of RBS, this is not the first time this year its subsidiary Natwest has suffered an outage. Its banking app went down briefly in April and in July a glitch with its card payments left customers unable to use their cards in shops or online.

RBS, the largely state-owned lender that has cost British taxpayers almost a hundred billion pounds in bailouts, losses, fines and legal fees, also has a rich history of outages, including a major blackout in 2012 that lasted for over a week, disrupting customers' wages, payments and other transactions. The outage was allegedly caused by an "inexperienced" RBS tech operative's blunder. For the duration of the blackout, the only means many customers had of accessing basic banking services was to visit the local branch.

That, however, didn't stop RBS from embarking on a branch closure rampage, blaming the growth of internet banking for its decision to close one in four of its branches. Now, it can't manage to keep those web-based services up and running, leaving customers even worse off. Even as the lender has increasingly digitized its services, it has consistently downsized its IT services team. In 2017 it revealed that it planned to axe 900 IT jobs by 2020 and is doubling down on its outsourcing of IT roles to India to reduce costs.

This underscores one of the major problems high-street lenders have with technology. They never treat it as a mission-critical aspect of their business, even as that business becomes increasingly dependent on technological solutions to stay competitive.

Bottom line-obsessed bank executives are always looking for cheap, short-term shortcuts to IT issues, with the result that lenders — particularly, but not only, in the UK — have for decades under-invested in their sprawling, creaking, accident-prone legacy systems dating back to the primeval age of COBOL and mainframe technology. And if some banks had been thinking about trying to finally move off their legacy systems and drag their IT platforms into the 21st century, the recent botched IT migration at mid-sized TSB, which continues to sow chaos 23 weeks after it was supposed to be ready, will not encourage them to do so

Next Financial Crisis Is Already Here! John Lewis 99% Profits CRASH - Retail Sector Collapse

Stock markets

This week the mainstream press has been busy focusing on remembering the 'start' of the financial crisis of September 2008 "Lehman's Brother Collapse" that most of whom never saw coming. In act the financial crisis actually began much earlier than September 2008 with the first obvious signs of a credit crisis brewing being the collapse of two Bear Stearns hedge funds during July 2007, but it would take the mainstream financial press another year before they started to connect the dots for the train wreck well in motion.

31 Jul 2007 - Hedge Fund Subprime Credit Crunch to Impact Interest Rates 

Why Hedge Funds are Failing ?

Hedge funds, deploy leverage to enhance their exposure to markets, When things are moving in the right direction this results in phenomenal profits. However as is eventually the case, the 'bets' get bigger and bigger and its only a matter of time before the 'gamblers' find themselves on the wrong side of the market. This is what happened with Two of Bear Stearns Hedge funds, which placed highly leveraged bets on packages of subprime mortgage derivative products. When the value and credit worthiness of these bond packages called collateralized debt obligation (CDO') was cut due to the subprime defaults. 

The effect of this was to virtually wipe out the total value of the funds that had previously been rated as low risk. The problem here is that they should NOT have been rated as low risk. The CDO packaging enabled institutions to mix good risk and bad risk debt all in one pot and label it as good risk. Therefore the financial institutions earned a higher rate of return on what seemed like a relatively low risk CDO package. that was priced in the market price as low risk debt upon which hedge funds such as Bear Stearns leveraged to the hilt.

And here were talking about the Subprime Experts getting wiped out ! 

The Impact of Hedge Fund Losses ? 

The Hedge fund failures has two key effects.

1. A Financial Shock to the System - Results in a re-rating of risk across the board, as financial institutions during the boom period have loaded themselves up with similar CDO packages, which are now expected to be worth much less than previously thought. As the market is pricing them at a much higher level of risk.

2. Derivatives Ripple Effect - Bear Stearns weren't the only people betting on the subprime mortgage market using highly leveredged derivatives. Many 'less experienced' hedge fund gamblers and other financial institutions also have exposure, and we can expect many more failures in the market place as people try to rush for the exit to cut exposure. It is unknown how much damage will be done. But the mark down of the financial sector in advance of bad debt provisions is a clue that were talking about in the hundreds of billions of dollars and there in lies the credit squeeze.

Effects of the Credit Squeeze.

As financial institutions are forced to 'cover their bets' by making provisions for bad debts, and losing their high interest rate / 'low' risk subprime cash cows. They are in effect withdrawing liquidity from the market place and making it more difficult for borrowers across the board of all shapes and sizes to borrow money for whatever economic activity. This means that this will impact on the economy and thus depress the US housing market further which results in more foreclosures and more squeezing of credit to cater for this. 

I know with the passage of time the magnitude of events can diminish so here's a clip that illustrates just how close the U.S. Financial System came towards total collapse. At 2 minutes, 20 seconds into this C-Span video clip, Rep. Paul Kanjorski of Pennsylvania in February 2009 explains how the Federal Reserve told Congress members about a "tremendous draw-down of money market accounts in the United States, to the tune of $550 billion dollars." According to Kanjorski, this electronic transfer occurred over the period of an hour and threatened a further $5 trillion to be drawn out triggering a total collapse of the Financial System, which prompted Hank Paulson's emergency $700 billion TARP bailout action. 

And so once more most have missed what's staring them in the face, a retail sector in a state of collapse that I have been warning of for several years that the UK retail sector and likely the US and much of the rest of the western world's was facing a perfect storm of rising producer prices, falling consumer disposable earnings whilst at the same time continuing to haemorrhage customers to the discounters and internet giants such as Amazon. All of which would culminate in increasing pressure on profit margins and balance sheets. Which ultimately warned to expect multiple Woolworth's moments, i.e. giant retailers going bust, whilst in the meantime to expect the crisis to at the very least translate into job losses and the mothballing of many unprofitable stores, the closure of huge super markets, something that was unthinkable to most has fast been becoming a reality as distressed retailers attempt to bolster profit margins by cutting costs by closing stores that are no longer able to operate at a profit as the following video from April 2017 illustrates.

Asda Sales Collapse and Profits Crash! UK Retailer Sector Crisis 2017

And earlier still I warned that not even Britain's largest retailer Tesco was not immune to the consequences of the unfolding retail crisis.

Tesco Crisis - Stock Price 60% Collapse, Next WoolWorth's?

John Lewis 99% Profits CRASH!

Now today some 18 months on even one of Britain's supposedly strongest retailer, the John Lewis Partnership (includes Waitrose) has felt the full force of the ongoing collapse of the retail sector, by announcing a 99% profits CRASH. Just avoiding announcing a loss with a meager profit of just £1.2 million on sales of £5.5 billion. Whilst blaming the profits collapse on price matching the heavy discounting by rivals as each distressed major retailer battles for ever diminishing footfall, a trend that has been in motion since at least 2014 that continues to reach new heights of crisis point resulting major retailers literally disintegrating before our very eyes.

So today, whilst the mainstream media focuses on remembering the collapse of the Banking sector 10 years ago that triggered the Financial Crisis. However, none of the so called analysts have even gotten around to connecting the dots to realise that the next Financial Crisis is Already underway, playing itself out not in the housing market, or the banking sector but the retail sector! This is nothing new to those who have been reading my articles for the past 4 years as I have been charting the unfolding collapse of the retailer sector right from the retail sectors giant TESCO downwards as the following excerpt illustrates.

27 Oct 2014 - Could Tesco Go Bust? How to Save Tesco from Debt Bankruptcy Risk

Why Tesco Could Go Bust

The expected Tesco dead cat bounce for tesco's stock price may not even make into end of the year as horrendous shopping numbers start to come through by the end of December signaling Tesco's free fall towards inevitable losses had resumed that risks shaking the very fabric of Britain's supermarket culture that could result in what to many is the unthinkable that a giant such as Tesco could literally disappear over night! If you think it's impossible then maybe that's what many thought of phones4u with its 550 stores before it went bust in September, with Comet and Woolworth's before it, though some such as TJ Hughes manage to return after bankruptcy.

The reason why Tesco actually could go bust is the same reason that any entity right from an individuals to small companies to mega corporations such a Tesco or every whole nations can go bust such as the recent examples of Iceland, Greece, Cyprus illustrate which is DEBT.

To illustrate the magnitude of the crisis that Tesco faces is that a year ago when I first started to literally warn of Tesco's probable demise Tesco was worth approx £30 billion against debt and liabilities of approx £12 billion, against today Tesco is barely worth £13 billion with debt and liabilities of approx £15 billion (debt+pensions hole). The other critical factor in Tesco's debt crisis is what has happened to Tesco's profits, a couple of years ago Tesco was reporting profits of £4 billion, which was ample enough to service its debt mountain and waste on junk such as private jets for CEO's, but today that profit has been wiped out to just £112mln, and remains in a steep decline which implies LOSSES are around the corner, and when companies make losses DEBTS tend to EXPLODE higher, for it means the company needs to borrow money just to stay alive as it is unable to cover day to day activities such as paying suppliers and workers and of course debt interest of £500mln a year. What this does is to result in a quantum shift in debt vs assets in a relatively short period of time which tends to result in bankruptcy as no one is going to lend more money to a company with a ballooning debt mountain that it will increasingly be unable to service (interest payments) let alone actually repay.

Once upon a time one could focus on one major retailer at a time on a conveyor belt that would every couple of months spit out bad news for the latest retailer in distress. Instead today we have virtually EVERY major retail retailer in crisis with their managements all simultaneously pressing the panic buttons to try and get ever diminishing footfall through their doors. 

This year has seen the retail sector crisis turn into a catastrophe with several popular chains such as Maplin's and Toys R Us closing down ALL of their stores, with many more chains such as New Look, Debenhams and Marks and Spencer teetering on the brink, and not even the pound stores are immune to the unfolding high street catastrophe as illustrated by the fate of Pound stretcher.

Here's what happened to just 1 major retailer during the past year as Toys R Us traveled from crisis to bankruptcy and then the total closure of all of their US and UK stores. 

ToysRUs - The Trend Towards Bankruptcy

In December the British arm of Toys R Us came to within hours of going bust the followed it's american parent company's filing for bankruptcy protection in September 2017 which that triggered a downsizing programme through rapid store closures that are likely to see at least 200 of it's 866 US stores close in an attempt at reducing its $5 billion debt mountain which dates back to its leveraged buy out of 2005 that costs Toys R Us $400 billion a year in interest payments.

So it should not have come as much of a surprise that the British arm of Toys R Us with its 106 stores was heading towards a similar fate if not a 'Woolworth's' moment, as December saw the retailer teetering on the brink of collapse with the potential loss of 3200 jobs. The triggering factor for which is a £30 million black hole in its employees pension fund that had the Government Pension Protection Fund was demanding a near immediate payment of £9 million into to cover 3 years worth of past pension contributions, against which the distressed retailer was offering just £1.6 million as I covered in my following video at that time: 

However, whilst Toys R US managed too get through December's crisis still remained in deep distress, whilst The Entertainer Toy Shop chain has continued to thrive with its much smaller stores more convientely located within popular shopping malls, rather than Toys R Us's huge stores in distant retail parks as the following video illustrates of one little girls birthday shopping trip to The Entertainer Toy Shop.

The Entertainer Toy Shop Review

Unfortunately ToysRUs never stood an a chance with the crunch point being March 2018 when it appears the management threw in the towel when the bulk of ToysRUs stores were closed with Sheffield's mega store closing down in April 2018.

Here's a video once more of why the likes of Toys R Us are going bust, where basically shoppers get the whole store to themselves. How is such a large store going to survive without customers? We'll it's not! Also watching the patterns of behaviour amongst worried staff, who whilst trying to act normal were eagerly trying to find ways of intervening in attempts at pushing stock onto customers, something I am seeing repeating across the UK retailer sector from across the price range top to bottom. Retail workers are very, very worried about their jobs in virtually every high street store!